Major project sanction breaks trend

March 11, 2015
In the face of industry-wide cost cutting, project deferrals, and waning sector confidence, Statoil and partners sanctioning of the $31-billion Johan Sverdrup project in the Norwegian Sea proves that there are attractive investment opportunities in this market.
David Paganie • Houston

In the face of industry-wide cost cutting, project deferrals, and waning sector confidence, Statoil and partners sanctioning of the $31-billion Johan Sverdrup project in the Norwegian Sea proves that there are attractive investment opportunities in this market. Though capital-intensive, the key selling point is value.

The Johan Sverdrup field is considered by its investors and analysts alike to be world-class. Results of the 22 appraisal wells and subsequent production tests are well documented, including the main wellbore 16/2-17S that found a gross 82-m (269-ft), 28° API oil column in Jurassic sandstones and flowed 6,000 b/d of oil with very little pressure drop. Wood Mackenzie values the field at $11.2 billion with a Brent oil price breakeven of $41/bbl (NPV10) and a 23% internal rate of return.

Moreover, the 2.35-Bbbl oil field is expected to provide 10% of Statoil's global oil production by 2020, 25% of Norwegian production by 2025, and $40 billion of value for the Norwegian government. Indeed a milestone for Statoil, its partners, and Norway, but equally important is the impact it will have on the supply chain. Statoil estimates that the development of Phase 1 will require 51,000 man-years, 34,000 of which are expected to be delivered by the supply chain. Further, an average year is estimated to require 2,700 man-years in the operating phase and 3,400 man-years during full field development.

The project partners submitted their plan for development and operation of Phase 1 to Norway's Ministry of Petroleum & Energy this past February. Phase 1 facilities will include four bridge-linked platforms and three subsea water injection templates, with first production expected by the end of 2019. The long-term goal is a recovery rate of 70%, taking into account advances in technology for increased oil recovery in future phases. The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate believes that the method of injecting polymers could be used to boost recovery from the field.

In addition, the partners will submit two plans for installation and operation for pipeline transportation and the development of a power from shore solution. Norway's parliament (Storting) has decided that the field will be developed with power from shore, and that an area solution for the other fields on the Southern Utsira High region must be in place by start-up of Phase 2 in 2022.

The project partners are Statoil (40%), Lundin Norway (22%), Petoro (18%), Det norske oljeselskap (12%), and Maersk Oil (8%).

Sanctioning of Johan Sverdrup is not likely to spur a string of project FIDs, but it is encouraging, and it proves that there are attractive investment opportunities at any point in a cycle.

•••
Meanwhile, I am delighted to introduce the newest member of the Offshore editorial team, Sarah Parker Musarra. She joins as editor tasked with writing the monthly subsea column, authoring original feature articles, editing outside submissions, and posting content online.
Sarah can be reached at [email protected].Musarra
About the Author

David Paganie | Energy Conference Director

After 20 years with Offshore, David Paganie has transitioned into a new role within Endeavor Business Media as Energy Conference Director, effective Jan. 1, 2025. 

He is still leading the event content, chairing the conference advisory boards and working with the conference teams for Offshore's events (Subsea Tieback and Deepwater/Topsides) as well as Microgrid Knowledge's eventsHis success in growing event content and securing senior level executives as speakers has led to him creating many of the best practices at Endeavor. 

Paganie previously served as Chief Editor of Offshore magazine and Conferences Editorial Director. He oversaw the Offshore portfolio of print and digital editorial content and international oil and gas conferences. He also wrote the monthly Comment column for Offshore.

He previously served as Editor of Offshore Field Development International at ODS-Petrodata; and as an Analyst at Baker Energy. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree with a specialty in finance from Ohio University.